Holiday/Retirement homes Part 2
One of the things we have to look at when buying real estate is what is the best use of the money.
There are obvious equivalences. If I live at 1 Windsor Drive and you live at 3 Windsor Drive in an almost identical house, we should expect to be paying the same money for the pleasure of living in that area. If you rent your home and I pay an interest mortgage for mine then our monthly outgoings should be roughly the same. By that I mean, the cost of the rent and the cost of the mortgage money should be roughly the same, give or take 10%.
If you are paying £1,000 a month in rent, then I would expect to pay a similar amount for the money I’ve borrowed. If I had a repayment mortgage I would have a larger outgoing because I would be paying back the money I’d borrowed, which would be paying for the house itself so it eventually became mine. I dont count that amount, it is the cost of the money that should be the same as the cost of the rent. That means, if interest rates are at 5%, then £1,000 a month in outgoings on a notional 100% mortgage should be £12,000 a year. At 5% that would assume a purchase price for the house of £240,000.
It would be rare for the outgoings for both houses to be identical, but that is the equivalence. The further those figures get out of balance the more someone is paying over the odds for their home. Is it you?
Needing a Mortgage:
In terms of a holiday home, are your total costs realistic in terms of equivalences? If your mortgage costs are £1,000 a month, what are your repairs and maintenance costs? What are the taxes? Add up your total annual figure. Now ask yourself how many weeks of the year you intend using your holiday home. Now check the rental figures in the local newspapers (not the online rental sites). If your total annual costs for the bought house come out at, say, £15,000, and you use the place on average two months a year, ask yourself whether holiday rentals are going to cost you more than £7,500 a month. The answer is that they are more likely to cost you £1,000 a month or less. Renting beats owning hands down. If you are retiring you will probably use the place effectively for the whole twelve months, so your cost is likely to be £12,000. Not that much difference, but rental is still a better deal.
There is an unfortunate unknown in the calculations. Will that 5% interest rate change over time, and by how much, and in which direction? If interest rates go up, the person with the mortgage is going to have to face a sudden increase in costs whereas the renter is less likely to be affected. The renter can take action to alleviate higher rents by moving somewhere else. If interest rates go up, the buyer cant do that because rising interest rates will cause house prices to fall.
One tends to buy real estate for the long term. Interest rate variations are short term movements. We now have the lowest rates in recorded history. Those rates may well stay low for the next two or three years. They may even stay low for the next decade. They wont stay this low for ever. At some stage they will rise, and rise substantially. If you are buying for your retirement you will be on a fixed income. You wont want interest rates to rise.
Paying Cash:
If you are paying cash, you would need to work on a different equivalence. You need to check what returns you could get on your money. Here we would be looking at very safe investments. One I recently recommended to a friend was an investment into solar panels for social housing in the UK backed by the government and returning 14% a year for a set period. There are many similar investments. With a locked-up banking system, there are companies that take deposits, and then lend on to developers with the deposits fully secured on hard assets. In other words, other companies are filling the lending gap left by banks. You can get returns of anything from 10% to 30% a year without too much trouble. For the moment let’s stick with the fairly simple and safe government backed investment, and use 14% as a bench mark.
Let’s go back and look at what your £240,000 could buy. You could buy that holiday home and have somewhere nice to stay, or you could invest the £240,000 and collect that 14% return. That equals £33,600 a year. As you can rent a nice holiday home for £1,000 a month, you will have a place to live plus an extra income of £21,600 a year, and when you get fed up with your current holiday home you just move on. With the extra £21,600 a year there are no headaches, no repair bills, no maintenance, no taxes; you are free, and you have a lot more money to have a much better lifestyle. What the heck would you want to be lumbered with a house for?
If you change your mind, then you can always buy later; your capital is still intact, but I seriously wonder whether, once hooked in the hassle free rental situation, you’d want to go back to owning.
If the figures were closer together I would think my argument would be based around lifestyle choices, but the figures diverge so much that it seems to me to be a simple matter of mathematics. An extra £21,600 a year for selling the house? Think about it.
john clare




